Skip to main content
LIVEWe're live!

Pathology LIS Selection Scorecard Template (Practical Framework)

7 min · Published 2026-03-02

Use this pathology LIS scorecard template to compare vendors objectively on workflow fit, cost, SLA, and migration confidence.

Why scorecards improve buying quality

Selection scorecards reduce bias by forcing teams to compare vendors against the same measurable criteria.

A structured approach keeps procurement, operations, and quality stakeholders aligned throughout evaluation.

Core scorecard categories to include

Use weighted categories such as workflow fit, total cost of ownership, support SLA, migration confidence, compliance controls, and integration capability.

Set category weights based on your business goals. For example, growth-focused labs may weight scalability and support more heavily.

How to run scoring sessions

Score each vendor after practical workflow validation, not after introductory presentations. Evidence-based scoring improves decision reliability.

Capture rationale behind each score so leadership can review assumptions transparently before final selection.

Using scorecards for final decision governance

Finalize only when commercial terms, implementation scope, and SLA commitments align with scorecard outcomes.

Document final decision criteria and expected KPI improvements to guide post-go-live accountability.

Next step for your lab

Want to apply this to your workflow? Book a personalized demo.